but, but, but..I thought that North Africans and Arabs were just good "White" "Caucasians" just like the French?
No??
You mean..there _is_ a difference???!

I've actually read Faye's work; a fascinating read. It ought to be translated.

Faye has been persecuted (errr..I mean prosecuted) for "hate-crimes" in France.

The author is very blunt, the only way to rid France of undesirable racial/religious elements in France (and by extension Europe) is through a civil/racial war. It’s the only way for Whites to take back their ancestral lands from the invader; non-Whites will have to be expelled en masse. Those who refuse to leave peacefully for their respective countries (after suitable financial compensation) will have to be forcefully expelled (hence, the potential for an armed conflict). Believe me folks the time is coming…I, for one, can't wait...Will also have to settle accounts with the naive and cowardly White politicians who have let them in. Actually, my hatred is directed at them, and not the immigrants as such.

BTW, colonization is spelled with an "s" in French

>> but, but, but..I thought that North Africans and Arabs were just good "White" "Caucasians" just like the French?

Heh. You thought 50% of Greeks are "suspect" too.

"But, but, but ... I thought that North Africans and Arabs were just good ' White Caucasians,' just like the French? No?? You mean ... there _is_ a difference???!"

Near-Eastern, Middle-Eastern, and North-African Arabic-speaking peoples are mostly white, just as Americans are, although American whites are a different kind of white than Arabic-speaking whites.

There used to be a vulgar little expression in pre-PC England: "The wogs begin at Calais." * Does that expression (which I now find extremely endearing, by the way, in light of what's been going on these past twenty-odd years) -- does that expression mean the French, Italians, Swiss, Germans, Hungarians, Poles, Austrians, Belgians, Spaniards, Russians, etc. -- all "wogs," according to that expression -- are unwhite? Of course not. They're all white, but each nation is white in its own unique way.

Each nation above being white, do I feel the entire U.K. population should be eradicated, as the Blairites feel,** and replaced with, let's say, Hungarians, or Belgian Walloons, or Russians, or one of the other groups? No, I don't. Nor should the Brit population be eradicated and then replaced with the whitest-looking North-African Arabs one can find. What should happen is it ought to be left the fricking hell alone by all the race exterminators and Ignatiev disciples out there.

Can rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth haters like Ignatiev leave races alone? Or must they be forever extinguishing them? These sick people can't sleep nights unless they're out there extinguishing some race or other.

I don't want to see the Anglo-Saxon race disappear. Is that so hard to understand? I also don't want to see the Polish one disappear, or the German one, or the Irish-Catholic one, or the Greek one, or the Portuguese one, or the Jewish one, or the Flemish one disappear.

Those who DO want to see, for example, the Anglo-Saxon race disappear are the biggest racist haters since the Nazis (in saying this, I speak as someeone who has no Anglo-Saxon ancestors, but am of Central and Eastern European extraction, with about half Russian-Jewish and Viennese-Jewish ancestors thrown in). These racist holocaust-inflictors include among their ranks the Noel Ignatievs of this world -- pure, nauseating, racist scum of the worst and most virulent sort imaginable.

( * I actually LOVE the spirit behind sayings like that -- which modern PC of course declares horrendously off limits -- because while this spirit does no harm whatsoever to anyone, it reflects what I think is a [totally harmless] *good*: a strong spirit of racial self-identity and solidarity and, what usually goes along that spirit, the mental wherewithal for racial self-preservation. Members of some group don't like that saying? Too bad -- it harms strictly no one, and furthermore no matter what group the person who doesn't like it belongs to -- be he French, Italian, Spanish, Hungarian, Negro, Arab, Vietnamese, Jewish, Latin American, or whoever on the planet -- I GUARANTEE his group has not only the corresponding "slur" against the Anglo-Saxons but likely has slurs that are a lot worse -- DEPEND UPON IT. And THOSE don't bother him in the least when he hears them uttered discreetly by his countrymen amongst themselves -- DEPEND ON THAT, TOO. Races today which are being ethnolysed unto extinction, like the Brits, need a little MORE of the spirit behind those sayings, not less. Maybe then they'll actually survive another five years, long enough to make some genetic copies so when they go under completely we'll have some prospect of bringing back a few museum specimens or something. There was a time when I, as did every other person who was concerned about people being nice to one another, agreed with claims that such expressions weren't nice, and ought to be eliminated, even from discreet, good-natured, half-joking parlance. But that was BEFORE I saw that this position was but a prelude to TURNING THE TABLES AND ACTUALLY EXTERMINATING THE BRITS AND OTHER WHITES AS IS BEING DONE TODAY ALL OVER EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA. The Brits' actual extermination, now well underway and orchestrated by the browns and their white allies, has taught me to know better than to be duped ever again by these rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth racists claiming oppostion to "racial prejudice" while all the time planning to wipe certain races off the face of the earth.)

( ** The Blairites want the entire British population eradicated -- every man, woman, and child -- and then replaced not with Hungarians, of course, or with Russians, or with Belgian Walloons, or with any other white people, but with non-white races and are, as everyone knows, working feverishly toward that goal even as we speak. They are in the process of committing, in broad daylight, under everyone's noses, the biggest social crime of the past ten thousand years.)

Really nice articel Unadorned!
I fully agree with you and I have no problem even with pure Jews if they would have the same spirit and of course are not totally degenerated. ^^
In fact I am from Vienna and know both, the worst and the best Jews and the difference in the group is bigger than the most Anti-Semitic people want to see.

But as a partly Jewish how do you think about the one of the from me most hatred man on earth Simon Wiesenthal and his Österreichischer Widerstand because he even attacked Giscard D'Estaign for his courageous words.

This whole book of Faye (not the abridged edition) is online free here in French language:

La colonisation de l'Europe, Guillaume Faye
1560 Kps

http://quarteron2.free.fr/paloma/fond/0103/colo.zip

Chris: " I fully agree with you and I have no problem even with pure Jews if they would have the same spirit and of course are not totally degenerated"

I believe the Jews are all white (barring the Fallashas) and should play a vital part in the defense of the West. Their fate is forever linked to that of Europeans all over the world.

There might be some truth to MacDonald´ s thesis about their past group behaviour in the West, but I see no reason why they could not be brought to the "anti-multiculti" side.

If I were a White Nationalist, I´d be sure to have the Jews on my side.

The problem is that the most Jews were/are predominantly Marxists, Liberalists and religious fanatics on their own.
All these three attitudes are a huge problem.
Whether I like the mostly Armenoid Jewish or not, if they think like that, I cant work with them.
So even if I forget about race, there is still a problem especialy if many Jews are in powerful positions.
If you want to change liberal society and dont want another pure marxist experiment, you have the most of the Jews as enemies whether you want or not.
Especially in Europe the Jews and their organizations are really a major problem because they are all liberal leftist or religious zionists.
In America its even worse, there are more jews which think in another way, but the majority want the same or is hiding behind the phrase of neo-conservatism which is nothing else than the destruction of democracy in the US for the absolut neo-liberal reign of money.

The main problem with Jews is as follows: They fear a collective society, the collectivists especially Anti-capitalists, Nationalists, Racists and Religious are hatred by them.
Maybe in the beginning not all of them hate the Jews, but if they fight against them, the rest decides to hate them.
The Jews say "oh they hate us" and fight all which sounds like collectivism and try to defend an individualism and try to establish a value of humans which is more interconnected with economic success and nothing else (no matter how they reached it).
So the collectivists hate them more...and so on...thats a long history of action and reaction and in the end if you are a collectivist, you have to fight most of the Jewish organisations and in the end the Jewish by themselves if they dont relent.
But because they want their security in totalitarian egalitarian or liberal individualist societies, there is not to much communication between (non egalitarian) collectivists and Jews.
People like Simon Wiesenthal dont ask you why you are against some Jewish organizations, they just fight you and so the war begins.
In Europe its so worse that even if you dont speak about race but say that not all human beings are of the same (which) is obvious) and want the elimination of genetical deseases in the Genotype you have serious problems not only with leftiest but also with the majority of the Jewish.

"The author is very blunt, the only way to rid France of undesirable racial/religious elements in France (and by extension Europe) is through a civil/racial war."

The civil war has already begun. The other side's assassination of Pim was ordered without any doubt whatsoever at the highest levels of the same Tranzi ranks who are pushing massive incompatible immigration -- pushing it because they are positioning it as their ticket to lifelong power, position, and wealth (mistake: not lifelong, but dynasty-long, since these individuals envision their children and grandchildren taking over in the E.U. after their own tenure ends -- exactly as President Bush does). That unbelievably brazen spilling of the innocent Dutchman's blood by the other side, protecting what it sees as its vital interests under threat, may turn out to be followed by worse. The Tranzis aren't the only ones who can play the assassination game. Two can play THAT game.

Further bloodshed unfortunately is exactly what risks happening, since there are people who are not going to take the currently planned racial extinction of Europe and North America lying down -- me for one, and I will refuse to take it lying down if I'm the last man on earth to oppose it -- it's something I will never accept and the fact that the other side keeps pushing it can only mean it is underestimating the numbers of people like me out there -- underestimating our numbers, or our resolve, or both.

If such a tragedy of epic proportions occurs, the blood will be on the hands of those pushing this debacle and on no one else's. It is they who started it behind the scenes and tried to ram it down throats by force -- throats whereof overwhelming majorities time and again in opinion polls declared their opposition to their own ethnic cleansing -- without ever so much as an explanation, but only the now-familiar, nauseating, constant demonizing of those who raised their dignified voices solely to pose honest questions -- and they brazenly tried to accelerate the speed wherewith they rammed it down our throats, to minimize the chances of opposition -- because the faster the race changes the less time those targeted for extinction will have in which to protest their own accelerating ethnolysis.

Those pushing this debacle are NOT primarily the Jews, whether those in Europe or North America. Yes, there are Jewish groups in both places who conspicuously push all the time, in myriad ways, for the weakening of their ancient rival, white-Euro Christendom, and everybody knows this -- Jews know it, Christians know it -- and if the white-Euro Christians had their heads screwed-on frontwards and weren't afflicted with their own deadly degenerate diseases like the sickest liberalism imaginable, such Jewish nuisances (and parallel Christian-origin nuisances of the same stripe) would amount to no more than the bite of a gnat -- wouldn't even be noticed.

That said, it must be noted how extremely foolish Jewish groups are -- it's just incredible, mind-boggling, how foolish they are to do this -- to support white-Euro ethnolysis as part of this program of theirs, this dream of permanently weakening white-Euro Christendom. It's foolish beyond words because 1) it makes them targets of those who oppose this project, and 2) if it's ever pulled off, and white-Euro Christendom is destroyed, what would follow it, whether a privileged international Tranzi régime -- with slave underlings -- that would make the old Soviet Nomenklatura look like rank amateurs, or Chinese hegemony, or a neo-Nazi takeover, or whatever -- what would follow it in power likely would qualify sooner or later as the Jews' worst nightmare. The Jews should understand that you can't have everything, and the present set-up with the two-thousand-year-old Christian irritant in their sides may be the best they can hope for. Besides, if white-Euro Christianity is going to be ethnolysed it will do it to itself -- all Jews need do is wait patiently on the sidelines. No need to make themselves targets of whichever side is resisting the process.

In this whole scheme of things the Jews are but a cog in a vast machine engineered by our own white-Euro Christian élites, let no one make any mistake. The side that focuses blame for this mess on the Jews, whether here or in Europe, is the side that will lose because it will have let the real culprits off scot-free.

>> The other side's assassination of Pim

Pim Fortuyn was assassinated by a Nordic Dutchman.

"Pim Fortuyn was assassinated by a Nordic Dutchman." -- Dienekes

Of course, but the Tranzis were pulling that poor dupe's strings.

For more than a decade through my twenties and early thirties I lived in Belgium just south of the Dutch frontier, and my friends and I used to cross into Holland (Maastricht) as often as, say, one took the subway into Manhattan when I was growing up in Queens -- which is to say, all the time. I know that part of the world at least as well as Dienekes knows Greece, I imagine. Weapons are much more controlled there than here, and cities and their public streets and squares are much more orderly and surveilled, any detail that seems out of the ordinary immediately sticking out like a sore thumb. Trust me, no one easily stalks a major politician with a rifle in broad daylight there without being as obvious as a neon sign, let alone some pathetic confused green amateur kid.

That killing is comprehensible only as a hit job ordered at the highest levels of the pro-immigrationist establishment who saw everything they'd worked so hard for, everything they'd built, suddenly threatened by Pim's popularity which had taken off like a rocket.

A major election was approaching. Pim had to be eliminated -- in a hurry.

That's called a conspiracy theory.

Yeah, and I've got plenty of tinfoil left if you need any, Jason -- Reynold's Wrap, too -- good brand!

"That's called a conspiracy theory."

Then it's an obvious lie!

(What a brilliant rebuttal!)

"There might be some truth to MacDonald´ s thesis about their past group behaviour in the West, but I see no reason why they could not be brought to the "anti-multiculti" side."

Some non-Zionist Jews are already anti-multiculturalist. I don't mind them staying, they have a different culture to be respected - as Europeans. But as they outcompete us there should be some kind of quota to stop too many Jewish admissions to universities and to high status professions.

Mind you some Zionist Jews are infiltrating white nationalism, comparing the situation with native Palestinians in Palestine to the situation of illegal immigrants in Europe and America. They want a "white America" without Moslem immigration, thats all.

Nobody is guilty of being against European interests just for being Jewish. But, it is fair to see someone's Jewish identity as something to be wary of because of their heritage.

Caitlin: " Nobody is guilty of being against European interests just for being Jewish. But, it is fair to see someone's Jewish identity as something to be wary of because of their heritage."

That amounts to saying we should be wary of Europeans too because they have a tendency to commit auto-ethnolysis!

My point is, it is far better to have them as allies instead of as enemies. It is in their interest to preserve european culture. They may me prone to forget the fact, but then Europeans are about as guilty as them of destroying european civilisation.

"But as they outcompete us there should be some kind of quota to stop too many Jewish admissions to universities and to high status professions."

Or maybe the gentiles should just study harder? Ever think of that? Jews study and work their butts off to get the University places they get and whatever else they achieve in life. Nobody hands them anything on a silver platter. Affirmative action for gentiles is NOT what I'm struggling for in this whole deal -- sorry!

"Some non-Zionist Jews are already anti-multiculturalist. I don't mind them staying ... "

Gee, Caitlin, thanks! You sure they're not an imposition, now? Awwwwwww, you're SO kind!

"Mind you, some Zionist Jews are infiltrating white nationalism, comparing the situation with native Palestinians in Palestine to the situation of illegal immigrants in Europe and America. They want a 'white America' without Moslem immigration, that's all."

Infiltrating? Odd word. Some Jews have their heads screwed-on frontwards, yes. They're not "infiltrating" anything. They're joining the side they see as both right and in their interest.

"Nobody is guilty of being against European interests just for being Jewish. But it is fair to see someone's Jewish identity as something to be wary of, because of their heritage."

Yeah, they might try to put one over on the gentiles. Better watch out. (Don't you see how dumb this sounds? There's only one truth, and nobody has a copyright on it. It's accessible to everyone. The Jews aren't hiding it. Anyone who wants can go out and find it.)

If anyone wants to ensure that opposition to the ethnolysis of white-Euro Christendom already underway will fail, let him ignore the real culprits and target the Jews as the main villains. That'll get him strictly nowhere -- GUARANTEED.

(For the record, I'm Catholic.)

"That amounts to saying we should be wary of Europeans too because they have a tendency to commit auto-ethnolysis!

My point is, it is far better to have them as allies instead of as enemies. It is in their interest to preserve european culture. They may me prone to forget the fact, but then Europeans are about as guilty as them of destroying european civilisation."

Yes, I know. As I said, I have nothing against them.

I do agree that the problem is the lack of ethnocentrism in Europeans and that the Jews are just looking after their own interests. I would actually respect Middle Eastern culture - the original heritage of the Jews - more than northern European heritage.

"Or maybe the gentiles should just study harder? Ever think of that? Jews study and work their butts off to get the University places they get and whatever else they achieve in life. Nobody hands them anything on a silver platter. Affirmative action for gentiles is NOT what I'm struggling for in this whole deal - sorry!"

Well, I'm sorry but that is Kevin MacDonald's suggestion based on a biological difference leading to a higher verbal IQ in Ashkenazim. Similarly East Asians outcompete whites for university places. The ethnic majority have a right to come first in their own country. If biological differences are real then that has to be taken into account in policies, surely. What is anti-immigration, except affirmative action to save jobs for the majority ethnic group? I think it is just asjustifiable, myself.

"Gee, Caitlin, thanks! You sure they're not an imposition, now? Awwwwwww, you're SO kind!"

Someone can't have a double nationality, and my point is that Zionist Jews have a bond to Israel, while non-Zionist Jews do not. The same applies to any group with foreign loyalties. Wether they are Zulus, Australians or whatever.

"Infiltrating? Odd word. Some Jews have their heads screwed-on frontwards, yes. They're not "infiltrating" anything. They're joining the side they see as both right and in their interest."

I wouldn't call myself "white nationalist" because I'm more interested in culture than race. ("Whiteness" is just a fact of my ethnicity). But this is the trend that some have commented on... Ethnic groups promote their own interests, and Jews are no different.

Why should ethnocentric Americans worry about the Moslems but not the Jews? Why not work with Moslems against Jews? I am European New Right, I don't mind either in the country... but it is common sense that neither should cme first over majority interests.

"Yeah, they might try to put one over on the gentiles. Better watch out. (Don't you see how dumb this sounds? There's only one truth, and nobody has a copyright on it. It's accessible to everyone. The Jews aren't hiding it. Anyone who wants can go out and find it.)"

You are right that the flaw in with Europeans - but ethnic minorities take advantage. Nobody is suggesting a vast Jewish conspiracy - note that I wrote "Some non-Zionist Jews are already anti-multiculturalist. I don't mind them staying, they have a different culture to be respected - as Europeans."

I appreciate that most Jews are not part of any plot, and that Jews do not form a conspiracy as one. But every group of people who shares an identity, shares an interest together. Try reading Kevin MacDonald's first book to understand what I mean.

"If anyone wants to ensure that opposition to the ethnolysis of white-Euro Christendom already underway will fail, let him ignore the real culprits and target the Jews as the main villains. That'll get him strictly nowhere - GUARANTEED."

And I agree with that. I think you are misunderstanding what I meant.

"(For the record, I'm Catholic.)"

I think MacDonald is Catholic but I don't think it matters - he wasn't blaming Catholicism and I'm not either. He was just explaining how West is unique among urban civilisations.