Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access published online ahead of print October 21, 2003
Human Molecular Genetics, 10.1093/hmg/ddg359
Shamil Sunyaev et al.
The accumulation of genome-wide information on single nucleotide polymorphisms in humans provides an unprecedented opportunity to detect the evolutionary forces responsible for heterogeneity of the level of genetic variability across loci. Previous studies have shown that history of recombination events has produced long haplotype blocks in the human genome, which contribute to this heterogeneity. Other factors, however, such as natural selection or the heterogeneity of mutation rates across loci may also lead to heterogeneity of genetic variability. We compared synonymous and nonsynonymous variability within human genes to their divergence from murine orthologues. We separately analysed the nonsynonymous variants predicted to damage protein structure or function and the variants predicted to be functionally benign. The predictions were based on comparative sequence analysis and, in some cases, on the analysis of protein structure. A strong correlation between nonsynonymous, benign variability and nonsynonymous human-mouse divergence suggests that selection played an important role in shaping the pattern of variability in coding regions of human genes. However, the lack of correlation between deleterious variability and evolutionary divergence shows that a substantial proportion of the observed nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms reduce fitness and never reach fixation. Evolutionary and medical implications of the impact of selection on human polymorphisms are discussed.
Posted by Dienekes at October 21, 2003 04:57 PM | PermaLinkWhat?
Posted by: Helios at October 21, 2003 08:07 PMDear Dienekes:
I know it takes time, but you might want to write little intros or after-comments on more of these abstracts you post, since abstract-speak can be difficult to deciper.
I'm assuming that this one supports Greg Cochran's argument that, on the whole, genes evolve to help you, not kill you, and that killer genes generally don't spread widely, so that much of the hyped hopes about immediate medical payoffs from genome research by finding killer genes is likely to be overblown. Am I in the ballpark?
Posted by: Steve Sailer at October 23, 2003 10:44 AMThe study found that genetic drift is important in human genetic variation, and also that negative selection of deleterious SNPs in protein-coding regions is "relatively strong in comparison to genetic drift."
Posted by: Dienekes at October 23, 2003 10:41 PM