Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1011: 21–35 (2004). doi: 10.1196/annals.1293.003
Mitochondrial DNA Variation in the Aboriginal Populations of the Altai-Baikal Region: Implications for the Genetic History of North Asia and America
ILIA A. ZAKHAROV et al.
The discovery of mtDNA types common to Asians and Amerinds (types A, B, C, and D) forced investigators to search for those nations of Asia which, though not considered the ancestors of the Amerinds, have retained a close genetic resemblance with them. We collected samples and studied the gene pools of the Turkic-speaking nations of South Siberia: Altaians, Khakassians, Shorians, Tuvinians, Todjins, Tofalars, Sojots, as well as Mongolian-speaking Buryats. The data indicate that nearly all Turkic-speaking nations of Siberia and Central Asia, as well as the Buryats, have types A, B, C, and D in their gene pool. The highest total frequency of these types is observed in the Tuvinians and Sojots. They, as well as the Buryats, also have the lowest frequency of the europeoid types. The most mixed Asian-Europeoid gene pool examined turned out to be that of the Shorians. An important finding was the presence of type X in the Altaians, which had not yet been detected in Asia. As shown by computer analysis, this DNA sequence is not a late European admixture. Rather, the Altai variant X is ancient and can be close to the ancestral form of the variants of contemporary Europeans and Amerinds. The presented results prove that of all nations in Asia, the Turkic-speaking nations living between Altai and Baikal along the Sayan mountains are genetically closest to the Amerinds.
Posted by Dienekes at May 19, 2004 10:38 PM | PermaLinkI am interested in discussing DNA relation between Amerindians and Middle Eastern populations. I am currently working on critiquing the FARMS "Book of Mormon" argument that a small Jewish, Middle Eastern group of immigrants infused into a larger Mesoamerican population around 600 B.C. I am interested if there is any way to test such a notion with DNA in any way shape or form, taking into account founder effect and genetic drift. I would thin you could through using biological remains from both locations, with a sizable sampling and compare the frequencies of markers. Yet, I have no experience and wonder if this is a testable model that would get one closer than comparing modern populations.
Thanks for the help.
Zeitgeist
Posted by: Zeitgeist at June 5, 2004 07:31 PMThe Book of Mormon is unscientific. Modern Native Americans belong mainly in Y chromosome haplogroups Q3 and C, while modern Near Easterners (including Jews) have no Q3 and C.
Posted by: Dienekes at June 6, 2004 04:33 PM