July 25, 2004

Color Complex In The South Asian Diaspora

Jennifer Hochschild, a Harvard professor of government and Afro-American studies believes that skin color, rather than race, may be a better indicator of status in the United States.

In a talk May 6th 2003 at Stanford University entitled "The Politics and Morality of a Skin Tone Ordering," Hochschild's "strong" hypothesis was, in her words, that across races "the darker a person's skin color, the lower he or she is likely to be on any scale of whatever is broadly perceived to be desirable in the United States."

In other words, in America, one is still better off as a dark-skinned Hispanic than as an African American. And within these minority groups the less dark-skinned you are, the better off you are socially.

Now, according to three different studies conducted by Indian Americans in the U.S., skin color appears to have similar impact.

...

Roksana Badruddoja Rahman of Rutgers University has completed an unusually interesting research study: The role of skin color among Hindu Indian women in New Jersey and how it affects their marriage choice. Sarita Sahay has looked into self-esteem and ethnic identity including attitude towards color among South Asian Canadian female students. And Zareena Grewal at the University of Michigan has studied the impact of color in spouse selection among the South Asian American Muslim community.

...

Rahman’s conclusion is that “feelings related to beauty and attractiveness and marriage marketability are partially determined by the lightness of their skin.” And though her subjects are “Hindu Indian women” one can imagine that her findings are applicable to all women of Indian or South Asian origin.

...

Sahar, a nineteen-year-old Desi from New Jersey, bemoans the plight of the single girl deemed unattractive: “If a girl has a major flaw, she’s just stuck. It’s sad but . . . in society, if a girl is extremely overweight or extremely underweight, if she’s very, very dark complected. These are all physical things, just physical abnormalities.”

...

As another informant, Sultana, says: “Well, in [South] Asian communities, because there are so many shades, most everyone prefers light skin. And if they are dark, they have to at least be charming and pleasant looking. If they are not, then they are in big trouble. And it is much, much worse here than in India and Pakistan because over there if you are ugly . . . if you have any kind of deficiency than at least you can make it up with money. “O.K. my daughter’s not beautiful, but I can give you a house.” But here no one needs money. They all have money and so they can’t compensate deficiency with money. See, we parents are afraid [of our children marrying dark skinned mates] because, if not for this generation, then the next generation, our grandchildren. Because dark color is dominant over light color . . . and the children will carry the dark color [because it] is a dominating feature . . . and it stays over the generations.”

Link (IndoLink) [Many more interesting experiences in the link]

Posted by Dienekes at July 25, 2004 03:33 AM | PermaLink
Comments

Gia sou Dieneke!
Absolutely fascinating posting -- I'd been looking for lowdown like this for ages.
Cheers,
Carolus

Posted by: Cathal Copeland at July 25, 2004 11:17 AM

P.S. Off I go at a tangent. Remember the controversial href="http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=13139"> Black and White Barbie test? ("Colorado school bans third-grader's Barbie racism experiment")

The interesting thing is that the so-called 'Black Barbie' in the photo looks more like a white girl with a suntan.

Posted by: Cathal Copeland at July 25, 2004 11:34 AM

Sorry, screwed up the code. The link is here .

Posted by: Cathal Copeland at July 25, 2004 11:36 AM

Some things are so obvious that it takes a genius to discover it. The preference for lighter skinned people must be an strong and universal human feature. Now, somebody discover why. Does lighter skin have a survival value?

Posted by: jaime at July 26, 2004 03:05 PM

In Countries like China, dark skin is a signifier of social status. As dark skinned Han people work in the fields, they have lower status than lighter skinned people who work indoors in higher skilled jobs.

Women dont mind so much darker skinned mates because its acceptable that men would be more likly to work 'outside'. while of course lighter skinned females would be of a higher value due to their association with longer schooling or tuition. Pavlovian conditioning has set in at the population level to association dark with the bad and lighter skin with the good. This may in fact explain some of the northern europeans contempt for frequently swarthy meds.

Posted by: StephenF at July 27, 2004 12:00 AM

Of course i shoudl phrase that first bit better:

"In Countries like China, dark skin is a general signifier of social status. As Han people working in the fields are prone to tanning and farming seen as peasent occupation, darker people would have percieved lower status than lighter skinned people who for instance may work indoors in higher skilled jobs.

Posted by: StephenF at July 27, 2004 12:04 AM

It's a little more complicated: to paraphrase Mae West's comment on Cary Grant, women like men who are tall, dark, and handsome. When it comes to women, however, blondes have more fun.

Posted by: Steve Sailer at July 27, 2004 11:43 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?